The Ghana Bar Association (GBA) is challenging a recent directive issued by Acting Chief Justice Paul Baffoe-Bonnie on how newly filed cases and applications are assigned to courts, describing it as vague and potentially disruptive to the delivery of justice.
In a statement dated April 26, the GBA expressed concern that the directive lacks the clarity needed to ensure consistency, transparency, and fairness in judicial processes. The legal body cautioned that ambiguity in such administrative decisions could hamper public confidence in the justice system.
“The directive by His Lordship, the Acting Chief Justice on the assignment of cases by his office is uncertain,” the GBA stated, calling for its immediate withdrawal.
Beyond the withdrawal request, the GBA advocated for a more systematic and technology-driven approach to assigning cases. It emphasized that embracing digital solutions would not only streamline case scheduling but also curb human interference and boost transparency.
The Association stressed the urgency of adopting reforms that prioritize efficiency, especially in a country where the backlog of cases and slow justice delivery continue to affect trust in the judiciary.
The GBA’s stance adds to ongoing calls for the judiciary to modernize its operations and ensure that reforms align with principles of fairness and legal accountability.
