Story By: Felix Ernest Odamtten / Muhammad Faisal Mustapha
Ghana’s renewed campaign to protect its rivers from illegal mining has intensified along the Bia River, where the National Anti-Illegal Mining Operations Secretariat (NAIMOS) has launched targeted operations against mining activities in Krokosue in the Juaboso District and Patakro in the Bodi District.
The operation, conducted on August 7, 2026, combined riverine and mobile patrols to identify active mining operations along the Bia and its tributaries. The intervention forms part of NAIMOS’ broader effort to deny illegal miners access to critical water bodies and prevent further degradation of river ecosystems.
During the…
[04:08, 8/10/2026] Nii Okpoti Media: Final Story:
[04:08, 8/10/2026] Nii Okpoti Media: “Minister Upholds Revocation of Adamus Resources Mining Leases After Independent Review”
Story By: Felix Ernest Odamtten / Muhammad Faisal Mustapha
Ghana’s Minister for Lands and Natural Resources, Hon. Emmanuel Armah Kofi Buah, has upheld the revocation of three mining leases held by Adamus Resources Limited, bringing a significant administrative review to a close after an Inter Ministerial Committee examined the company’s petition challenging the original decision.
The Minister’s final determination follows the submission of the committee’s report and confirms the earlier revocation of the Akango, Salman and Nkroful mining leases. The decision places renewed attention on regulatory compliance, financial obligations and environmental governance within Ghana’s mining sector.
The original revocation was announced in April 2026 after the Minister acted on recommendations from the Minerals Commission. Those recommendations followed a series of inspections by the Commission’s Inspectorate Division, which reported what it described as sustained and material breaches of the Minerals and Mining Act, 2006 (Act 703), and subsidiary mining regulations.
According to the Minerals Commission’s findings, the alleged breaches included the unauthorised assignment of mineral rights. The Commission said portions of Adamus Resources’ concessions had been subleased to foreign nationals for independent mining operations without the prior written approval of the Minister, contrary to Section 14(1) of Act 703.
The Commission further reported that mining had taken place outside demarcated and permitted areas without an approved Operating Permit from the Chief Inspector of Mines. Such activities, according to the regulatory findings, were contrary to Regulations 200(1)(b) and 200(1)(d) of the Minerals and Mining (Licensing) Regulations, 2012, L.I. 2176.
Environmental and forestry compliance also featured prominently in the findings. The Minerals Commission reported that the company had failed to obtain requisite environmental and forestry approvals from the Environmental Protection Authority before operations commenced in areas that had been assigned, citing Section 18 of Act 703.
“The decision places regulatory compliance, environmental responsibility and the protection of Ghana’s mineral resources at the centre of the Adamus dispute.”
The review process subsequently examined the company’s response to the initial revocation and its cooperation with an Interim Management Committee established to oversee the mine. The committee reportedly concluded that Adamus had failed to cooperate adequately and had concealed information and supplied what it considered misleading data.
The committee’s findings also identified significant financial obligations. These included approximately US$2.56 million in unpaid mineral rights fees, GH¢86.8 million in unpaid royalties and GH¢290.5 million in tax arrears, according to the information presented in the review.
The financial review also raised questions about gold exports and transactions involving related parties. The committee reportedly identified unexplained variances in gold exports and found that approximately US$224 million had been transferred to related parties outside Ghana between 2020 and 2024.
Environmental financial assurances were also examined, with the review finding that the company’s environmental bonds remained only partially fulfilled. The issue adds another dimension to the regulatory dispute, given the financial obligations associated with mitigating and rehabilitating environmental impacts arising from mining activities.
“For Ghana, the question is no longer simply who holds a mining lease, but whether that lease is being exercised within the law and in the national interest.”
Following the Minister’s determination, Hon. Buah and officials of the Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources and the Minerals Commission undertook a working visit to the mine site. The delegation engaged key stakeholders, including workers whose livelihoods are directly connected to the operation.
During the visit, the Minister assured stakeholders that the Minerals Commission would work to ensure uninterrupted operations at the mine pending any further decision by the government. The assurance was significant for workers and communities dependent on the mine, particularly amid uncertainty surrounding the future ownership and management of the affected concessions.
The government’s position also signals an attempt to separate regulatory enforcement from disruption to legitimate economic activity and employment. Maintaining operational continuity, while resolving outstanding regulatory and financial issues, will remain a delicate task for the authorities.
Hon. Buah has further indicated his intention to secure an order requiring Adamus Resources to fully and promptly settle its outstanding royalty, tax and other financial liabilities to the Government of Ghana. If pursued, the move could become an important test of the government’s determination to recover public revenues associated with mineral exploitation.
“Mining investment must come with accountability to the law, to the environment, to workers and ultimately to the people of Ghana.”
The Adamus case comes at a time when Ghana is under growing pressure to strengthen governance of its mineral resources, improve revenue mobilisation and ensure that mining companies meet environmental and regulatory obligations. The government’s handling of the case is therefore likely to attract close attention from investors, regulators, workers and communities in mining areas.
For the mining industry, the episode offers a broader reminder that mineral rights are accompanied by legal, fiscal and environmental responsibilities. For government, the challenge will be to enforce those responsibilities consistently while maintaining investor confidence and protecting jobs and communities.
The final determination on the three Adamus leases now closes the committee level review, but important questions remain over the company’s outstanding obligations, the future management of the affected operations and the eventual status of the mining assets. The next phase will depend on further government action and the implementation of the obligations identified during the review.
Ultimately, the Adamus Resources dispute has become more than a disagreement over three mining leases. It has evolved into a test of Ghana’s regulatory resolve, its ability to protect public revenues and its commitment to responsible mineral development. As the government moves to enforce the findings, the outcome could set a significant precedent for how mining rights, environmental safeguards and financial obligations are enforced across Ghana’s extractive sector.
