In the wake of mounting public speculation and commentary surrounding its ongoing legal and commercial standoff with Engineers & Planners (E&P), Azumah Resources Ghana Limited has reaffirmed its commitment to a responsible and transparent resolution process while cautioning against unauthorized statements that could derail delicate negotiations.
In a statement issued by its Board of Directors on Sunday, July 13, the mining company addressed what it described as increasingly unverified narratives, particularly distancing itself from recent public remarks made by policy analyst Bright Simons.
The company made clear that Mr. Simons, known for his social innovation and policy advocacy, has no formal ties to the company and does not represent its views, shareholders, or board in any capacity. “His comments are his personal opinions and do not reflect the position of Azumah Resources,” the board clarified.
The firm emphasized that it is currently engaged in confidential, good-faith discussions with E&P, under the guidance of relevant regulatory and ministerial authorities, and remains optimistic about achieving a constructive and lawful resolution.
“We are fully committed to resolving this matter professionally and respectfully, guided by principles of transparency and due process,” the statement read.
Azumah Resources further appealed to media outlets, commentators, and the general public to refrain from speculative reporting, urging reliance on verified communications issued by authorized company representatives. The company emphasized that premature or inaccurate commentary could undermine the trust and progress made so far in the mediation process.
In a separate clarification, the company addressed references to the ECOWAS Bank for Investment and Development (EBID) in public discourse, noting that while the Bank had expressed indicative interest in the transaction, any assumptions of finalized commitments are misleading and unauthorised.
As the situation unfolds, Azumah Resources has positioned itself as a firm committed to institutional accountability and private sector diplomacy, reinforcing its stance that business disputes—no matter how complex—can be resolved within the boundaries of law, professionalism, and mutual respect.
