Former Special Prosecutor Martin Amidu has strongly criticized efforts to publicly leak or discuss unverified petitions related to the ongoing process to remove Ghana’s Chief Justice, emphasizing the need to uphold constitutional confidentiality.
Amidu highlighted the Supreme Court’s clear guidance under Article 146 of the Constitution, which mandates that the contents of removal petitions remain confidential until a prima facie case is established or dismissed, and until a committee completes its investigation and submits its report to the President.
He warned that any attempt by public figures—including Council of State members or prominent citizens—to influence the process through public commentary or leaks is unconstitutional and risks undermining the integrity of the judicial review.
“At this stage, no one has the right to disclose or comment on the petition’s details,” Amidu said, stressing the importance of respecting the Supreme Court’s ruling and the sanctity of due process.
That said, Amidu affirmed the importance of transparency after the committee’s work concludes. “Once the President acts on the recommendations, Ghanaians deserve full disclosure of the petition, the committee’s findings, and its recommendations,” he said. “This transparency is essential for the public to assess whether justice has been served.”
Reinforcing his stance on democratic sovereignty, Amidu reminded the nation that ultimate authority rests with the people. “The electorate is the true appellate body, not unelected judicial panels. The Judiciary exists to serve the people, not to dominate them,” he declared.
In closing, Amidu issued a clear warning to those seeking to manipulate or obscure the constitutional process: “Stop underestimating We-the-People.
