Alimatu Issahak urges Ellen Daaku to uphold civility in political communication
The tone of political commentary in Ghana has once again come under scrutiny as gender advocate Alimatu Issahak publicly criticized Ellen Ama Daaku, an aide to former Vice President Dr. Mahamudu Bawumia, for what she described as “unguarded” and inflammatory remarks targeting high-profile government officials.
Speaking to reporters, Alimatu emphasized the need for restraint and maturity in public communication, especially from individuals who occupy influential positions in academia and politics.
“Ellen must peg herself. Her recent unguarded statements don’t help anybody, including herself,” Alimatu said, adding that public trust in leadership is shaped not just by policy, but also by the tone and conduct of those in public life.
Alimatu’s remarks follow a series of sharp criticisms allegedly made by Daaku against senior figures in government, including Foreign Affairs Minister Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa. The advocate expressed concern that such personalized attacks are detrimental to the country’s political discourse.
“If we want national conversations to mature, we must move away from personal attacks and focus on substance. Political communication should foster unity, not deepen division,” Alimatu added.
In a striking moment during her comments, Alimatu questioned Daaku’s academic credibility and position at the University of Professional Studies, Accra (UPSA)—a move that may itself stir debate about the boundaries of constructive criticism.
Observers say the spat is part of a growing concern about the deteriorating standards of political dialogue in Ghana, where personal insults, social media outbursts, and partisan jabs often overshadow policy and governance discussions.
Alimatu called on all political communicators, regardless of affiliation, to exercise greater responsibility, especially in a period of heightened political activity ahead of the 2024 elections.
“We can disagree without being disrespectful. Civility is not a weakness—it is a democratic strength,” she said.
The episode highlights a broader national conversation about how public figures—especially women in politics—navigate criticism, power, and public accountability in an increasingly polarized media landscape.
