The Supreme Court is set to hear a crucial constitutional case on Wednesday, April 9, 2025, that could have far-reaching implications for the process of removing a sitting Chief Justice in Ghana.
The case, initiated by Old Tafo MP Vincent Ekow Assafuah, questions the legal procedure followed by President John Mahama in addressing multiple petitions that have called for the removal of Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo.
Assafuah’s suit centers on the claim that the Chief Justice was not granted an opportunity to respond to the allegations against her before President Mahama began consultations with the Council of State.
The MP argues that this action violates Article 146(6) of the Constitution, which he believes ensures the right of a high-ranking official like the Chief Justice to be heard prior to any such proceedings.
In legal filings, Assafuah, represented by former Attorney-General Godfred Dame, asserts that the President’s decision to move forward without allowing Torkornoo to defend herself not only compromises her constitutional rights but also threatens the independence of the judiciary.
He contends that such a process could set a dangerous precedent, undermining the integrity of judicial independence in Ghana.
The case is being closely watched as it will address the crucial question of whether the current procedure for removing a Chief Justice adheres to constitutional requirements.
The ruling is expected to clarify the proper legal steps for the removal of high-profile public officeholders, making this a landmark case with the potential to shape the country’s legal framework for years to come.
