Bawku Central Member of Parliament Mahama Ayariga has reaffirmed that the President’s handling of the Chief Justice’s appointment and removal strictly adheres to constitutional provisions, pushing back against allegations of constitutional breaches.
In a detailed briefing with the Parliamentary press corps on May 28, 2025, Ayariga, a lawyer by training, emphasised that both the appointment and removal processes of the Chief Justice are inseparable and clearly outlined in the Constitution, leaving little room for arbitrary contestation.
He warned parliamentarians against interfering with the Judiciary’s independence, calling for respect for the separation of powers fundamental to Ghana’s democratic governance.
“Those who accept the office must also accept the constitutional process for removal. This comes as a package,” Ayariga stated, challenging calls for public hearings or alternative procedures not explicitly provided for in the Constitution.
Beyond the Chief Justice issue, Ayariga weighed in on recent appointments to the Supreme Court, highlighting the growing workload faced by Ghana’s Apex Court compared to counterparts like the U.S. Supreme Court, which selectively hears cases.
“Because appeals come as of right in Ghana, the Supreme Court’s caseload demands a larger bench — but the economy’s capacity to support this expansion must be considered carefully during vetting,” he said.
Recalling his tenure on the Parliamentary Appointments Committee, Ayariga revealed that they previously recommended waiting for justices to retire before making new nominations, to allow successive administrations a fair share of appointments.
His remarks underscore ongoing debates on judicial independence, fiscal prudence, and the balance of powers as Ghana navigates the complexities surrounding its highest court.
