The Minority Caucus in Parliament has intensified criticism of the government’s handling of public administration, arguing that growing coordination challenges among ministries and state agencies are undermining effective governance and service delivery.
Speaking during parliamentary proceedings on Wednesday, June 10, Minority Leader Alexander Afenyo-Markin contended that the administration is struggling to manage key sectors despite being in office for 18 months.
According to him, apparent disagreements among government institutions, particularly in areas relating to public sector recruitment and policy implementation, point to broader weaknesses in leadership and oversight.
Mr. Afenyo-Markin cited challenges within the education sector, claiming that differences between the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Education have affected efforts to recruit qualified teachers.
He argued that such disputes reflect a lack of cohesion within government and raise concerns about the administration’s ability to effectively coordinate its agencies and departments.
The Minority Leader further suggested that internal tensions within government structures have contributed to inefficiencies that could negatively impact public service delivery and national development.
He also referenced recent public controversies involving some government officials, describing them as additional signs of a leadership structure facing operational difficulties.
“These developments suggest a government that is struggling to maintain effective control over its own institutions and processes,” he stated during the debate.
The remarks form part of an ongoing political contest over the government’s performance, with opposition lawmakers increasingly scrutinising policy implementation, public sector management and institutional effectiveness.
The government has consistently maintained that it remains focused on delivering its development agenda and strengthening public institutions despite challenges inherited from previous administrations.
The latest exchange in Parliament highlights the continuing debate over governance, accountability and the efficiency of state institutions as both sides seek to shape public perception of the administration’s performance.
